San Bernardino Bail Bond Proposal

October 1st, 2010 | Written by Bail Bonds Blog

San Bernardino Proposal Would Charge Bail Agencies San Bernardino, California – The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors are considering a proposal to charge bail bond agencies a fee for posting jail board ads in the county detention facilities. Currently, all San Bernardino County jails provide a jail board, which alphabetically lists the services of local bail bond agencies approved by the California Board of Insurance. San Bernardino County jails presently feature a list of 135 bail bond agencies, none of which are charged for posting their jail board ad. The proposed ordinance would require bail bond agencies to be charged $50 per month for each ad posted in the four-county jails, as well as $10 per month for each ad posted at the sheriff stations. A sheriff’s custody specialist would be responsible for monitoring the jail board list, verifying licensees, printing list updates, and collecting fees. If implemented, the proposal would generate $97,200 annually.  

Controversial CO Bail Bond Measure

September 15th, 2010 | Written by Bail Bonds Blog

Larimer County, Colorado – Controversy is brewing in Colorado over Proposition 102– a November ballot measure seeking to change the handling of criminal defendants awaiting trial in Larimer County. Colorado Bail Bond-Related Measure Sparks Controversy Proposition 102 would ban judges from assigning defendants to pretrial services on unsecured bonds with the exception of first-time offenders accused of non-violent misdemeanor crimes. In contrast, only defendants utilizing surety bonds obtained through a bail bond agency for a fee would be able to be assigned to pretrial services. As background, pretrial services involve the screening and examination of a defendant by a bond commissioner who determines their flight risk and potential community threat if released. Under a personal recognizance bond, defendants promise to appear in court with no monetary commitment between the court and the defendant. Under a surety bond, defendants utilize the services of a bail bond agent, who agrees to guarantee the appearance of the defendant in court or pay the court the entire bond amount. Opponents of Proposition 102 argue that the measure would lead to defendants spending increased jail time, ultimately leading to higher jail populations and increased state costs. Supporters of Proposition 102 point to public safety issues of offenders being released from jail on personal recognizance bonds. County commissioners on Tuesday, September 14 unanimously approved a resolution against Proposition 102.

CA Insurance Codes

September 1st, 2010 | Written by Bail Bonds Blog

California Insurance Codes – Section 1728 and 1820 The California Insurance Codes are the compiled California laws regarding insurance, including the licensing of bail bond agents. Section 1728 requires that every bail bond agency have an office in the state to conduct business. In addition, the office location must be present on all license applications. 1728. Every resident insurance fire and casualty broker-agent shall maintain a principal office in this state for the transaction of business. The address of the office shall, pursuant to Section 1658, be specified on all applications for license and renewal applications. Subsequently, section 1820 requires that every bail agency prominently display their bail license in every office location. 1820. Every bail license shall be prominently displayed in the office of the licensee.  

Bail Bond Rates

In general, the standard industry rate for bail bonds is 10% of the face amount of bail. For example, if the face amount of bail is $10,000, the fee is $1,000. Read More


We offer affordable interest-free credit terms that are tailored to your financial situation. You can even put as little as 0-5% down (OAC). Read More